Back to Blog
Isadora rangel5/19/2023 He said his party is “inclusive,” but his words ring hollow given how Florida Republicans have treated their LGBTQ constituents. Rick Scott’s rebuke of the Texas platform this week. There’s a bit of solace in Florida GOP U.S. We believe there should be no granting of special legal entitlements or creation of special status for homosexual behavior.” But it’s not paranoia to wonder what could happen in red states when you read the Texas Republican Party’s 2022 platform: “Homosexuality is an abnormal lifestyle choice. Supreme Court could come for gay marriage and contraception Capitol Police watch an abortion-rights rally from behind the security fence surrounding the Supreme. Without that precedent, states would be allowed to arrest and prosecute people who engage in gay sex. 2, 1986 Parents are Fernando Magalhaes Rangel and Vera Maria Sala Has three siblings Tatiana, Ana and Wagner Lima Plans to major in journalism at KU Nickname is quoteIsa. Texas, the court ruled that a Texas law that made same-sex sexual activity a crime violated the 14th Amendment’s due process clause. Personal Full name is Isadora Sala Rangel Born Dec. Hodge is reversed, you can guess on which side of the gay-marriage debate Florida would fall. Madero, Ciudad de México, México 26 seguidores 26. If the landmark 2015 ruling on Obergefell v. Isadora Arredondo Rangel Directora de Comunicaciones y Afiliación de la Cámara Nacional de Comercio en Gustavo A. Connecticut ruling, the middle-aged men who run most state capitols cannot prohibit you from accessing birth control. Wade - thinking they’d never have an abortion, anyway - it’s time to start caring. The court’s three liberal justices echoed that concern, writing in their dissenting opinion that “no one should be confident that this majority is done with its work.”įor women who couldn’t care less about the end of Roe v. Wade is just the first shoe to drop in the court’s usurpation of rights we thought were woven into the fabric of our society. His writing confirms fears that the overturn of Roe v. He wrote that “.we have a duty to ‘correct the error’ established in those precedents.” He spoke for himself, not the other five conservative justices, but his opinion is an implicit invitation for red states to pass laws that run afoul of those precedents in hopes of reversing them. Under Thomas’ reasoning, Friday’s ruling elicits the revision of all similar precedents.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |